[atlas] Paris-traceroute variations
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Paris-traceroute variations
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] IPv6 ICMP - denied packets
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Mon Jun 30 12:19:05 CEST 2014
>> apologies. i guess it was in the paper not the preso, uppr right of >> page 3 of >> C. Pelsser, L. Cittadini, S. Vissicchio, and R. Bush, From Paris to >> Tokyo: On the Suitability of Ping to Measure Latency, 2013 Internet >> Measurement Conference. >> <http://conferences.sigcomm.org/imc/2013/papers/imc125s-pelsserA.pdf> >> the intuition is that it is a function of the richness of the path >> diversity. >> perhaps a tunable? > The way it looks to me is that that section argues that you need more > than 6 and that 32 is enough. It doesn't really say that 16 is not > enough :-) it's been a while, and something happened to my memory but i forget what. but i suspect it is dependent on the diversity of the particular path. > But I just created an internal ticket to have the limit raised to 64. > That should be ample for anybody who wants to experiment. cool! randy
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Paris-traceroute variations
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] IPv6 ICMP - denied packets
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]