[atlas] Paris-traceroute variations
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Paris-traceroute variations
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Paris-traceroute variations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Philip Homburg
philip.homburg at ripe.net
Mon Jun 30 12:11:31 CEST 2014
On 2014/06/27 22:31 , Randy Bush wrote: > apologies. i guess it was in the paper not the preso, uppr right of > page 3 of > > C. Pelsser, L. Cittadini, S. Vissicchio, and R. Bush, From Paris to > Tokyo: On the Suitability of Ping to Measure Latency, 2013 Internet > Measurement Conference. > <http://conferences.sigcomm.org/imc/2013/papers/imc125s-pelsserA.pdf> > > the intuition is that it is a function of the richness of the path > diversity. > > perhaps a tunable? The way it looks to me is that that section argues that you need more than 6 and that 32 is enough. It doesn't really say that 16 is not enough :-) But I just created an internal ticket to have the limit raised to 64. That should be ample for anybody who wants to experiment. Philip
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Paris-traceroute variations
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Paris-traceroute variations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]