[ipv6-wg] Last Call for publication of RIPE-501bis (reply by 20120426)
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call for publication of RIPE-501bis (reply by 20120426)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Update on IPv6 Address Distribution
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Koch
pk at DENIC.DE
Wed May 2 08:36:59 CEST 2012
Shane, > > 1) I'm missing RFCs 2671 and 3226 ("Do support EDNS0 and do it right") > > in the list of requirements for mobile nodes. RFC 3596 is present, > > though. Usually the former are mandatory but I have no idea what > > special size considerations might have applied here. > > > > 2) Since all other devices are required to support EDNS0 with "large > > enough" payloads, the requirements list for CPEs should probably > > contain RFC 5625, so the CPEs do not get in the way of all those > > compliant gear on both sides. > > I think we need to publish the document without these changes. This is > a case where "the perfect is the enemy of the good"(*). believe it or not, that phrase even exists in German ;-) > Regarding future versions or an errata list... my own advice would be to > leave EDNS0 RFCs out of this document, since it is intended for IPv6 > recommendations not as a general "here are good things to have" > document. I admit I'm not sure where such a list would reside. :( I think consistency is key here, next time. -Peter
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call for publication of RIPE-501bis (reply by 20120426)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Update on IPv6 Address Distribution
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]