[ipv6-wg] Last Call for publication of RIPE-501bis (reply by 20120426)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call for publication of RIPE-501bis (reply by 20120426)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Shane Kerr
shane at time-travellers.org
Tue May 1 13:34:50 CEST 2012
Peter, On Thursday, 2012-04-26 15:04:40 +0200, Peter Koch <pk at DENIC.DE> wrote: > > http://go6.si/docs/Requirements-for-IPv6-in-ICT-equipment-v.9.pdf > > really good and comprehensive list. Two remarks, the weight of which > to be determined by the authors: > > 1) I'm missing RFCs 2671 and 3226 ("Do support EDNS0 and do it right") > in the list of requirements for mobile nodes. RFC 3596 is present, > though. Usually the former are mandatory but I have no idea what > special size considerations might have applied here. > > 2) Since all other devices are required to support EDNS0 with "large > enough" payloads, the requirements list for CPEs should probably > contain RFC 5625, so the CPEs do not get in the way of all those > compliant gear on both sides. I think we need to publish the document without these changes. This is a case where "the perfect is the enemy of the good"(*). Regarding future versions or an errata list... my own advice would be to leave EDNS0 RFCs out of this document, since it is intended for IPv6 recommendations not as a general "here are good things to have" document. I admit I'm not sure where such a list would reside. :( -- Shane (*) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_is_the_enemy_of_good
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call for publication of RIPE-501bis (reply by 20120426)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]