[db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
MarcoH
marcoh at marcoh.net
Fri Feb 6 13:45:01 CET 2004
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 12:32:42PM +0000, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > It's been very quiet on the list since the frantic activity > at the end of last week. I expect day-to-day reality has > imposed itself. > > I've done some further thinking, and have reviewed the contributions > last week on the db-wg list. I've tried to recognize the issues and > alternatives in this message and to make proposals as straw-men for > consensus. > > I've used a bullet-point approach, as I think no-one is likely to > have time to read anything more discursive. I'll happily explain > anything that people find too terse. Sounds good, but what do you consider 'primary objects', as in what templates will be modified to allow for abuse-mailbox and/or abuse-c ? Grtx, MarcoH
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]