[db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niall O'Reilly
niall.oreilly at ucd.ie
Fri Feb 6 14:02:42 CET 2004
On 6 Feb 2004, at 12:45, MarcoH wrote: > Sounds good, but what do you consider 'primary objects', as in what > templates will be modified to allow for abuse-mailbox and/or abuse-c ? Sorry, I should have made this clearer. I'm thinking of inet*num, aut-num as 'primary'; person, role, mntner as 'indirect'. This would involve extending 6 templates for 'abuse-mailbox' and 3 templates for 'abuse-c'. Ppl may think of others. Niall
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]