[db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
MarcoH
marcoh at marcoh.net
Fri Feb 6 15:26:45 CET 2004
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 01:02:42PM +0000, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > > On 6 Feb 2004, at 12:45, MarcoH wrote: > > >Sounds good, but what do you consider 'primary objects', as in what > >templates will be modified to allow for abuse-mailbox and/or abuse-c ? > > Sorry, I should have made this clearer. > > I'm thinking of inet*num, aut-num as 'primary'; person, role, mntner > as 'indirect'. This would involve extending 6 templates for > 'abuse-mailbox' > and 3 templates for 'abuse-c'. Ppl may think of others. To get this clear you mean this ? inetnum abuse-c abuse-mailbox inet6num abuse-c abuse-mailbox aut-num abuse-c abuse-mailbox mntner abuse-mailbox person abuse-mailbox role abuse-mailbox Looks fine to me...the best of both worlds, although we might consider to also extend irt with the abuse-mailbox and allow abuse-c to refer to an irt object ? But maybe I'm opening another can of worms here. Grtx,
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]