[anti-abuse-wg] DRAFT: RIPE proposal - implementation of an
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DRAFT: RIPE proposal - implementation of an
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DRAFT: RIPE proposal - implementation of an
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jørgen Hovland
jorgen at hovland.cx
Sat Apr 10 14:17:40 CEST 2010
Hello, On 09/04/2010 21:43, Frank Gadegast wrote: > > to do something against abuse that is coming from their networks. > > What is abuse, and why do you think you are a better judge than the government? > Working against them will need some kind of "punishment", and sure there > is more to talk about first with this. But at least there will be > some kind of identification, wich one needs to be educated > or even "punished" with this kind of system. > The consequences are still for further discussion. > > But this already exists (the law). Anyone else dealing with punishment, like some blacklists do, is by me considered having a very poor credibility. If you want things to be done better against abusive activity on the internet, why don't you become a politician? RIPE is a registry. That's it. If you think it is difficult to find contact information in the registry, perhaps RIPE should make improvements to http://www.db.ripe.net/whois ? Cheers,
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DRAFT: RIPE proposal - implementation of an
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DRAFT: RIPE proposal - implementation of an
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]