[anti-abuse-wg] DRAFT: RIPE proposal - implementation of an
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DRAFT: RIPE proposal - implementation of an
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DRAFT: RIPE proposal - implementation of an
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeffrey Race
jrace at attglobal.net
Sat Apr 10 14:32:28 CEST 2010
Legal systems are ineffective in dealing with this type of issue for well understood structural reasons. See <http://www.camblab.com/misc/univ_std.txt> based on <http://www.camblab.com/nugget/spam_03.pdf> On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:17:40 +0200, Jørgen Hovland wrote:>Hello, >>On 09/04/2010 21:43, Frank Gadegast wrote: >>>> to do something against abuse that is coming from their networks. >>>What is abuse, and why do you think you are a better judge than the >government?> >> Working against them will need some kind of "punishment", and sure there >> is more to talk about first with this. But at least there will be >> some kind of identification, wich one needs to be educated >> or even "punished" with this kind of system. >> The consequences are still for further discussion. >>>But this already exists (the law).
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DRAFT: RIPE proposal - implementation of an
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DRAFT: RIPE proposal - implementation of an
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]