[address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
George Giannousopoulos
ggiannou at gmail.com
Tue Jan 1 23:26:57 CET 2013
Hi, I support too George On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Emilio Madaio <emadaio at ripe.net> wrote: > > Dear Colleagues, > > > A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-552, "IPv6 Address Allocation > and Assignment Policy", is now available for discussion. > > > You can find the full proposal at: > > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-10 > > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to > <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 28 January 2013. > > Regards > > Emilio Madaio > Policy Development Officer > RIPE NCC > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20130102/8bd02c0d/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]