[address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daryl Tanner
daryl.tanner at blueyonder.co.uk
Wed Jan 2 13:02:46 CET 2013
I support this On 31 December 2012 14:08, Mathieu Paonessa <matoa at vayu.net> wrote: > Dear All, > > I also support this. > > On 12/31/12 11:12 AM, Emilio Madaio wrote: > > Dear Colleagues, > > > > > > A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-552, "IPv6 Address Allocation > > and Assignment Policy", is now available for discussion. > > > > > > You can find the full proposal at: > > > > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-10 > > > > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to > > <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 28 January 2013. > > > > Regards > > > > Emilio Madaio > > Policy Development Officer > > RIPE NCC > > > > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20130102/76ac0ea0/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]