[atlas] "Spoofing" tests.
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] "Spoofing" tests.
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] "Spoofing" tests.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
Sun Sep 8 13:45:13 CEST 2013
On 07.09.2013, at 19:39 , Joe Provo <jzp-ripe at rsuc.gweep.net> wrote: > There was traffic seeming to support the idea of a properly opted-in > method (as recently as 30 July) but there hadn't been specifics > regarding the implementation nor commitment that it would get to > such a one. :-) And there was traffic clearly opposed to the idea as well. I cannot see any consensus there yet, one way or the other. And then there is the question of cost to implement and priorities ... Daniel
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] "Spoofing" tests.
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] "Spoofing" tests.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]