[atlas] Strong doubts about the option "DNS recursion"

On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:59:12 +0200 in <20131025115912.GA2543 at nic.fr>, 
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic.fr> wrote:

> 
> > Another thing is that just silently setting the flag is not optimal,
> 
> It is not "not optimal", it is _wrong_.
> 
> > maybe the measurement should have been rejected instead.
> 
> And the documentation fixed!

Give us the source code also, the software will be also fixed in less
than one hour.

Does RIPE plan to release source code or not ?

How can a user (its working on whatever you what) trust a measurement
system that just do not give the basic level of transparency that a
measurement system *need* to be trusted ? The availability of the source
code to every single user ! the code can be modified or not, I just do
not care about license issue, what I care about is the measurement
system transparency, the rest is poetry for brainless persons). 


-- 
Jérôme Benoit aka fraggle
OpenPGP Key ID : 9FE9161D
Key fingerprint : 9CA4 0249 AF57 A35B 34B3 AC15 FAA0 CB50 9FE9 161D
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20131026/600b5aa4/attachment.sig>