[atlas] msm_name in DNS measurements?
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] msm_name in DNS measurements?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] News about RIPE Atlas anchoring measurements
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
Thu Nov 7 08:53:48 CET 2013
Grown-ups and never depend on undocumented features/data ..... ;-) Sorry, could not resist ...... Daniel (who has been acting childishly from time to time) > On 11/6/13 7:50 PM, Lars-Johan Liman wrote: >> vnaumov at ripe.net: >>> You can ignore it. It is for the system purposes. >> Umm. This is a very disappointing answer. The RIPE NCC always prides >> itself in being transparent. The answer above is not a supporting >> fact. >> >> It may well be that the field is for system purposes, but please do >> describe those system purposes. We are engineers, not children. >> >> Best regards, >> /Liman >> #---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> # Lars-Johan Liman, M.Sc. ! E-mail: liman at netnod.se >> # Senior Systems Specialist ! Tel: +46 8 - 562 860 12 >> # Netnod Internet Exchange, Stockholm ! http://www.netnod.se/ >> #---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 163 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20131107/c890ad9e/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] msm_name in DNS measurements?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] News about RIPE Atlas anchoring measurements
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]