[atlas] Atlas probe - virtual appliance?
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Atlas probe - virtual appliance?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Atlas probe - virtual appliance?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Iñigo Ortiz de Urbina
inigo at infornografia.net
Wed Jun 19 13:34:31 CEST 2013
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote: > > > Virtual firewalls work great with VMware and cost effective as well, > > 90% cost saving > >> But virtual appliances are generally pretty bad at network monitoring. > > nigel meant time-dependent measurements > Allow me to share some interesting links with Daniel Suchy (and the list archive) regarding the virtualization impact on CPU, disk I/O and time accuracy: o Short article published at labs.ripe.net [1] not long ago around the Atlas Anchors. o Talk by Randy himself [2][3] on probe/measurement calibration Regards, [1] https://labs.ripe.net/Members/romeo_zwart/ripe-atlas-anchor-to-ripe-ncc-service-node [2] https://ripe66.ripe.net/presentations/128-130513.tokyo-ping.pdf [3] https://ripe66.ripe.net/archives/video/12/
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Atlas probe - virtual appliance?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Atlas probe - virtual appliance?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]