[ncc-services-wg] Charges for legacy holders
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Charges for legacy holders
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] NCC Services WG Draft Agenda - RIPE 68
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niall O'Reilly
niall.oreilly at ucd.ie
Sat Apr 26 17:35:52 CEST 2014
At Fri, 25 Apr 2014 10:15:02 +0100, Nigel Titley wrote: > > Option 2.4, according to the proposal, is for those legacy holders who > meet the criteria to engage with a sponsoring LIR "but cannot find a > Sponsoring LIR with which a mutually satisfactory contract of the kind > mentioned in that section". The board sees this option as being for > legacy holders who are *unable* to find a sponsoring LIR rather than > those who *do not want* to find a sponsoring LIR. I've noticed two things here. The more significant one is that we'll need to establish a common understanding of just what the distinction should be between *unable* and *do not want*. The other is that the passage cited is grammatically incomplete, as it is also in the on-line copy of ripe-605. This is likely my responsibility as editor of the proposal. I offer my apologies and will arrange to have it corrected. Best regards, Niall
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Charges for legacy holders
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] NCC Services WG Draft Agenda - RIPE 68
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]