[ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Sun Nov 3 06:38:51 CET 2013
At 01:09 03/11/2013 +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote: >This and the lack of quid-pro-quo are the two main reasons why this >proposal is critically flawed and why it should not become RIPE community >policy in its current form. > >Nick About 15 people stated their support for 2012-07 in this forum so for me as one of the authors I see this as consensus. Consensus does not mean everyone has to agree - just that most people need to agree. As I see it, most people agree. -Hank
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]