[ncc-services-wg] 2013-04 New Policy Proposal (Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2013-04 New Policy Proposal (Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2013-04 New Policy Proposal (Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Erik Bais
ebais at a2b-internet.com
Mon May 20 20:36:43 CEST 2013
Hi Tore, >> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/2011-May/005737.htm l > If I read it correctly, the linked to argument is against RPKI as a > whole. However, 2013-04 isn't a question on whether we should do RPKI or > not, but whether or not our *existing* RPKI stuff should be extended to > include non-members. Correct. > I've got one question though. What is the rationale for the requirement > that «the Internet resources reside within the RIPE NCC service region»? > I don't see the reason for this. IMHO, any PI/legacy space > issued/maintained by the RIPE NCC should be eligible for certification > under this policy, no matter where on (or off!) the planet it's being used. The intention is to provide the services for end-users / organizations within the RIPE NCC service region. That the resources itself are used outside the region can't and I think we shouldn't want to restrict. I'll see how to rephrase that before the review. Regards, Erik Bais
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2013-04 New Policy Proposal (Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2013-04 New Policy Proposal (Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]