[ncc-services-wg] Authentication Proposal for RIPE NCC Access
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Authentication Proposal for RIPE NCC Access
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Authentication Proposal for RIPE NCC Access
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roger Jørgensen
rogerj at gmail.com
Wed Dec 4 16:10:49 CET 2013
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Daniel Stolpe <stolpe at resilans.se> wrote: > On Wed, 4 Dec 2013, Sander Steffann wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>> We would like to propose to put this functionality in maintenance mode, >>> meaning that it would be provided as it is without a service guarantee. >>> Alternatively, it could be removed altogether. This would free us of a >>> maintenance and support burden, meaning that we can spend these resources on >>> other valuable services. >> >> >> I wouldn't mind if it was removed completely. > > > +1. > > Do we know if these users rely solely on X.509 or do they have other > options? I'm only using x509... or think I somehow can remember my password if I try very hard ... and no I haven't been contacted about this before this mail on the subject. ... and really, I don't care That much if it's true two-factor or not, it's the easy of use that is the important factor for me. -- Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE rogerj at gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger at jorgensen.no
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Authentication Proposal for RIPE NCC Access
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Authentication Proposal for RIPE NCC Access
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]