[ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niall O'Reilly
Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie
Thu Aug 30 12:41:24 CEST 2012
On 30 Aug 2012, at 11:00, Havard Eidnes wrote: > Therefore, I think I agree with what Daniel Karrenberg said about > what the present discussion should be about, I'm quoting: > > So what we have to decide as a community is: under which policies > does the RIPE community allow legacy space holders to register > their address space in the RIPE Internet Number registry. Nothing > more, nothing less. > > All other questions are secondary. Resolving conflicts about the > holdership/use of the address space is a non issue. Past agreements > about allocation of address space are a non issue. [...] > > (I have a question of terminology that I'll bring up in a separate > message.) I think I agree too. Background work on a new version of the policy proposal has begun. It is premature for me to say more at this stage. Best regards, Niall
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]