[mat-wg] [atlas] Proposal: Measure well-known CDNs,[CDN-HTTP]
- Previous message (by thread): [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas, RIPEstat and RIS Quarterly Planning Q1 2023
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Massimo Candela
massimo at ntt.net
Sat Dec 17 03:00:26 CET 2022
On 17/12/2022 00:19, Barry Raveendran Greene wrote: > > >> On Dec 16, 2022, at 23:29, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic.fr> wrote: >> >> There is a larger problem here, a more strategic one: such a feature >> would contribute to the centralisation of the Internet, which is >> already too important. Tagging some targets are "important" and >> "worthy of measurements" would mean that we consider some HTTP servers >> to be more useful than others. That would be a bad message from RIPE. > > We’ve come full circle - we started with centralized PTTs - moved to a decentralized ASN/Paul Baran model - now Re-centralized based on marketing domination. > > +1 with Stephane’s observation. The selection of who to measure is a statement. +1 Also, while the data would be useful, I don't think the role of the ripe ncc is to grade commercial services. Let other companies or individual researchers do that.
- Previous message (by thread): [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas, RIPEstat and RIS Quarterly Planning Q1 2023
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ mat-wg Archives ]