[ipv6-wg] Vacancy - nominations can go here
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Vacancy - nominations can go here
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Vacancy - nominations can go here
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Hogewoning
marcoh at marcoh.net
Sun May 18 10:00:23 CEST 2014
Please wait a bit :) a) there might be others b) as much as we don’t like overhead, let’s come up with some procedure c) I need to have a chat with Shane on exactly how we are going to do this I had several people including one of the candidates asking for a soft landing, where Shane and I gradually remove ourselves out of this, rather than just running off. So at a minimum we need to fix this in terms of timelines. Also it is not a given that there must be three, I think 4 is too many and you definitely need 2 for redundancy. First question to the group: how many working group chairs do you want in the end? Thanks, Marco On 17 mei 2014, at 19:53, Roger Jørgensen <rogerj at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Jan Zorz @ go6.si <jan at go6.si> wrote: > <snip> >> But now we've got 3 very good candidates - Jen, Dave and Benedikt - and I >> think we should rotate them in. > > Excellent suggestion, let's rotate Jen, Dave and Benedikt in. > > > > -- > > Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE > rogerj at gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! > http://www.jorgensen.no | roger at jorgensen.no >
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Vacancy - nominations can go here
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Vacancy - nominations can go here
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]