[ipv6-wg] RIPE 554 Errata Page
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE 554 Errata Page
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE 554 Errata Page
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilhelm Boeddinghaus
wilhelm at boeddinghaus.de
Mon May 27 09:37:04 CEST 2013
Am 26.05.2013 23:10, schrieb Peter Koch: > On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 08:50:05PM +0200, Wilhelm Boeddinghaus wrote: > >> anything in the document without getting a new RIPE document number. But >> having to many different versions of the document confuses our audience. > why is the audience less confused by the same number referencing different > content? > > -Peter > The audience for this document are the enterprises and public administration. They need help when they set up a tender. The vendors can live with changing document numbers, but not the enterprises and public administration. If major changes have to be made to the document we need a new number. This is also true for new sections or new RFCs. -Wilhelm
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE 554 Errata Page
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE 554 Errata Page
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]