[ipv6-wg] The DFZ and supernetting
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] The DFZ and supernetting
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] The DFZ and supernetting
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jasper Jans
Jasper.Jans at espritxb.nl
Mon Sep 19 12:52:21 CEST 2011
> It sounds suspiciously like ITU for me (ie, bad). It imposes previously > non-existent architectural limits and constraints on Internet routing > (given there is some form of routing police, of course :-)): How would > you multi-home across region boundaries? Good point. Only way is ending up with a kludge I guess where for those parties that connect over multiple summarization boundries you do not only carry a summary but also the more specific. Hence you loose effect towards less routes in the table for these parties. > What will happen with other inter-region connectivity? All AS:es who > peer over a region-boundary, they will have to stop? (Who can enforce > that?) > Or will they have to get space from each regions RIR and do prefix > translation in their routers? (This will amplify space usage by number > of regions, roughly, for operators with presence in more than one > region.) That can hardly be a correct way to go down. Sounds like this is for sure one of those items coming in the way of simple aggregation. > Jasper, how did you conclude that RIR region boundaries is a good place > to draw the line in the sand by the way? > Why, for example, didn't you suggest nation state borders? (Ie, > Denmark could have 0045::, Sweden 0046:: and so on) Just picked a boundry - I guess there are multiple boundries where aggregation can take place. For the moment I kinda stuck by the delegations known to me already (RIR/LIR/etc). Depending on how RIRs assign prefixes today you could implement summaries in between the RIR and LIR level. But in light of your point made above - it does seem to me that the more summaries are made on a smaller scale the more exceptions are required. In a way I also felt that it aligns well with what we for instance do - we do IP transit and peering. All peerings are mainly with parties inside Europe. Transit carries all the other traffic which is mainly US/Asia/etc. Jasper Op dit e-mailbericht is een disclaimer van toepassing, welke te vinden is op http://www.espritxb.nl/disclaimer
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] The DFZ and supernetting
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] The DFZ and supernetting
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]