[ipv6-wg] RIPE-501 replacement document - IPsec question to community - we need your input.
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE-501 replacement document - IPsec question to community - we need your input.
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE-501 replacement document - IPsec question to community - we need your input.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fweimer at bfk.de
Tue Dec 27 10:15:29 CET 2011
* Merike Kaeo: > On Dec 23, 2011, at 1:06 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> * Jan Zorz: >> >>> The authors of RIPE-501 are finalizing the last comments from previous >>> last call and would like community input for what to do with IPsec. >>> All authors feel that IPsec should be a mandatory requirement for all >>> devices although due to technical limitations, for mobile devices it >>> will be optional. >> >> Shouldn't it be the other way round? Mobile devices are more likely to >> need VPN services than other kinds of devices. > > Mobile devices typically use TLS. Most devices use TLS. I agree with dropping IPsec from the document completely, indepedent of device type. -- Florian Weimer <fweimer at bfk.de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE-501 replacement document - IPsec question to community - we need your input.
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE-501 replacement document - IPsec question to community - we need your input.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]