[ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101123) on changes: Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101123) on changes: Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101123) ended

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ivan Pepelnjak ip at ioshints.info
Sat Nov 20 19:21:38 CET 2010

> Thanks for commenting. Looking at the tekst you are right that there is
> some redundancy in the text, but it's not a conflict and it does not
> create ambiguity. The underlying message stays the same "If you need MPLS,
> you need RFC 4798".
> 
> Procedural I would like to publish as is instead of going into another
> cycle of editing and last call [...]
>
> [...] I suggest we collect the
> editorial comments and fix them in a future version.
> 
> Ivan, are you ok with this ?

Absolutely (and I totally agree with & support your reasons).

Although the two bullets overlap, they do not contradict each other and having them both is not harmful. Let's get this done.

Ivan

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101123) on changes: Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101123) ended

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]