[ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Tue Nov 9 10:23:48 CET 2010
On 9.11.10 3:56, Mohsen Souissi wrote: > I support this document to be published. Good work, well done. > > Some suggestions: > > - RFC 2461 (2 occurrences) to be replaced by RFC 4861? > - RFC 2462 (1 occurrence) to be replaced by RFC 4862 Hi, fixed, thnx for head up. Will be visible in next version of the draft. > What about load balancers, these types of equipment can hardly fit in > the categories defined (if I'm correct). Yet they might be a pain in > termes ov v6-v4 functional and performance parity. This document is intended to be published as BCP and we can add/change things also later, after publication. I agree load balancers hardly fit in any category, but we had to stop expanding the complexity at some point :) If we find approach how to specify that without adding more complexity, we can add that later, if community will agree on that. thnx, /jan
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]