[ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Tue Nov 9 09:34:24 CET 2010
On 9.11.10 2:29, Marc Blanchet wrote: > I know (and have been helping providers to deploy 6PE and 6VPE). My point is to > make it "mandatory" is the issue. The correct interpretation is "mandatory if functionality required" :) If you want to run 6PE or 6VPE, then it's mandatory that equipment supports it. Unconditionally mandatory are RFC lines, that does not contain "if required by". Does this make sense? /jan
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]