[ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael Schneider/calispera.com
michael.schneider at calispera.com
Mon Nov 8 19:51:09 CET 2010
Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote on 08.11.2010 19:02:29: > On 8.11.10 11:31, Marc Blanchet wrote: > > does not make sense to me. > > > > 6PE and 6VPE are two ways to run IPv6 over MPLS network, but are not the only > > ones. Therefore, it can not be mandatory. > What do you suggest? Re-wording, add additional mechanisms or move it to > optional section? > Basically it is written "If requested by tender initiator...", that makes it as > a choice... Hi, LDPv6 was a dream, but only in draft status [1] this time. So i don`t know where is a right place for it. [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-manral-mpls-ldp-ipv6-04 Regards Michael
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]