[ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Mon Nov 8 11:15:55 CET 2010
On 8.11.10 10:00, Isacco Fontana wrote: > 6VPE (RFC 4659) > 6PE (RFC 4798) > > These RFC are related to MPLS environment so I think 6PE and 6VPE should be > mandatory for ISP that are using MPLS and offer ipv6 for direct internet > connections and 6VPE for ipv6 over vpn mpls services. So, the correct wording inside mandatory section would be: - if IPv6 over MPLS and IPv6 over VPN MPLS features are requested, 6PE or 6VPE must be supported [RFC4798, RFC4659] The contracting authority shall specify the required protocol. Is this acceptable? Thnx, Jan Zorz
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]