[ipv6-wg] /127 for point to point links
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] /127 for point to point links
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] /127 for point to point links
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Fri Feb 12 17:21:39 CET 2010
> RFC 3627 is informational RFC. Does not describe any strict > rules. Read the RFC and understand /127 is harmful only in > certain cases: > poin-to-point link + usage of subnet anycast. Other problems > might exist as described in section 5. Chaos is harmful. Following consistent best practice on peering links is a good idea. > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-00.txt Yes, perhaps saying that /64 on all peering links is a bit too simplistic. Nevertheless, I do believe that everyone should follow best practice on peering links. This WG seems like a good place to agree on the specifics of what that best practice is since RFC 3627 is a bit too general for this. What do others think of drafting an IPv6 best practices document in this WG that is specifically for network operators? --Michael Dillon
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] /127 for point to point links
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] /127 for point to point links
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]