[ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Wed Feb 3 15:42:11 CET 2010
On Feb 3, 2010, at 1:01 AM, Gert Doering wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 04:20:55PM -0800, Leo Vegoda wrote: >>> But seriously, we will be living in this ugly world not long from now, >>> whether we like it or not. Why not try it out before it will be forced >>> on us? >> >> I agree with this statement. I think there is real value in >> experiencing the kinds of problems we are likely to see when the >> IPv4 address space has been fully allocated and further network >> growth cannot use unique IPv4 addresses. Having an optional CGN-style >> network to see what works and what needs to be improved would be >> genuinely useful. > > At the beginning of this thread, it was stated that the RIPE meeting > network is not to be treated as an experiment or testbed. Indeed. That's why I included the word "optional". Leo
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]