[ipv6-wg] Simulation of the future IPv4 world at RIPE meetings?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Simulation of the future IPv4 world at RIPE meetings?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Simulation of the future IPv4 world at RIPE meetings?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Hogewoning
marcoh at marcoh.net
Thu Sep 24 16:44:38 CEST 2009
On 24 sep 2009, at 16:30, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote: > If a /24 is used for NAT, considering the size of RIPE meetings, I > guess > nobody will notice anything inconvenient. It's a 1 in 3 mapping if you count heads, I guess devices is 1 on 5 :) If you think this won't raise any issues I guess the world in general doesn't have a problem, we can simply extend the IPv4 space by a multiple of 5 :P Even if open ports wouldn't be an issue, think of: - inbound connections (people using VOIP) - VPN to connect back home (meeting is still providing fixed IP for that purpose) - CPU load - traceability (Pentagon got hacked by somebody at RIPE-XX) Groet, MarcoH
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Simulation of the future IPv4 world at RIPE meetings?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Simulation of the future IPv4 world at RIPE meetings?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]