[ipv6-wg] Proposal for new charter

>> There are. I'll do that and help Shane modify the original proposal.
>
> And now with my working group chair hat on ;-):
>
> It is helpful if you post such comments (negative as well as positive)
> on the list so that people have a chance to show agreement or
> disagreement, or suggestions for improvement. Eg. it is much easier
> for Shane to know whether a particular direction makes sense if he
> knows that there is support from more than one person.

Shane has had a lot of support on this list. I think it would be best if
Shane remains the author of the new charter, as agreed at the last RIPE
meeting. I think having multiple versions of the charter text confuses
people. Shane is the one who wrote the first version. Let him look at the
comments and propose a second version. We can then see if we have
consensus on that version or if we need another version. But we should let
Shane do the task he was given at the meeting.

And after the charter is done we can start the co-chair election process.
Sander.