[ipv6-wg] Website Launch: www.IPv6ActNow.org
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Website Launch: www.IPv6ActNow.org
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Website Launch: www.IPv6ActNow.org
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeroen Massar
jeroen at unfix.org
Wed May 20 21:05:15 CEST 2009
Stream Service wrote: > Hello Shane, > > We just get 1 PA range from our network supplier. So we don't decide what to > route and what not to route... ip -6 ro add 2001:db8:10c4:l000::/64 dev lo (Or equivalent on your network gear) et presto And otherwise, ever heard of those devices called Firewalls? Greets, Jeroen (and don't come with "yeah but if we make a mistake it is routable" because if you make a mistake you will also leak that other prefix. Next to that, you can also just use 2002:RFC:1918::/48 if you really want to keep to those clashing prefixes of RFC1918. And as others mentioned ULA, which is the other correct solution, but might not be 100% globally unique, especially if people don't use the formula) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 187 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20090520/b0eea74d/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Website Launch: www.IPv6ActNow.org
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Website Launch: www.IPv6ActNow.org
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]