[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] RE: [6bone] /20 allocated - update your BGP filters!
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] RE: [6bone] /20 allocated - update your BGP filters!
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] RE: [6bone] /20 allocated - update your BGP filters!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Wed May 12 08:47:39 CEST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2004-05-11, at 11.48, Gert Doering wrote: > What I really don't understand is why people are getting so negatively > upset about /20s - what do you *want*? 1 billion /32s in the global > routing table, making "efficient" and "conservative" use of FP 001 ? Agreed. "Call me when we hit 1000 routes". Noone will be happier than me.... - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBQKHIj6arNKXTPFCVEQLh6QCgjf2THskiGTxsL5t4ewCdijU8IzAAninM +Bw9dcBeKyIapRv+QDvc4r4v =p6GG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] RE: [6bone] /20 allocated - update your BGP filters!
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] RE: [6bone] /20 allocated - update your BGP filters!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]