[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Actual IPv6 traffic

 From the agenda:

> C. Report(s) about *actual* v6 traffic volume as compared to v4?
>    *what's real* out there, not what's on powerpoint?
>    (input from the audience)

My input in advance:

I've been running some web measurements using a small image that can be 
linked on web pages to see whether the visitors are v6-capable or not. 
(The host that has the image has an IPv6 address and notes whether the 
image is requested over v4 or v6.) The results over the past months:

Site	IPv4				IPv6			Total
0		151 ( 98.05%)		3 ( 1.95%)		154
3		334 ( 94.35%)		20 ( 5.65%)	354
6		1355 ( 82.02%)	297 ( 17.98%)	1652
7		57 ( 75.00%)		19 ( 25.00%)	76
8		20107 ( 99.85%)	31 ( 0.15%)	20138
10		2918 ( 84.43%)	538 ( 15.57%)	3456
Totals	24925 ( 96.49%)	908 ( 3.51%)	25833

Note that the numbers refer to different sites with very different 
usage and IPv6 interest levels. Only number 8 is a very mainstream 
non-networking site (in Dutch) so I think this one represents average 
IPv6 capability for the web surfing public fairly well, at around 1 
user in 666 requesting the counter image over IPv6.  :-)

See http://www.muada.com/ to see the counter in action and for a link 
to the results page.

(BTW, it would help if someone would type sysctl -w 
net.inet6.ip6.forwarding=1 on router.ripemtg.ripe.net, or, failing 
that, kill the rtadvd.)