[dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Antonio Prado
antonio at prado.it
Wed Jun 12 21:46:21 CEST 2019
On 6/11/19 11:10 PM, Jonas Frey wrote: > This whole BCP (whatever that includes in detail) is nowhere > documented. hi, to be honest there is a meaningful BCP about the topic: RFC 5358, BCP 140, Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks. under "Recommended configuration" paragraph: In general, it is a good idea to keep recursive and authoritative services separate as much as practical. -- antonio -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 195 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/dns-wg/attachments/20190612/00858142/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]