[dns-wg] yet another heave on the WG Chair selection procedure
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] yet another heave on the WG Chair selection procedure
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] yet another heave on the WG Chair selection procedure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piotr Strzyzewski
Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Tue Jan 6 11:25:38 CET 2015
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 05:33:48PM +0000, Jim Reid wrote: Dear All > One sticking point appears to be the "A co-chair cannot serve more than 2 consecutive terms." provision in [2]. Someone commented at the mike at RIPE69 that this was a good thing. One of your co-chairs says the opposite. Everyone else has not commented one way or the other. Result: stalemate. [cut] > # > # $Id: appointment,v 1.6 2014/10/06 11:46:56 jim Exp $ > # [cut] I support the proposal and at the same time I agree with Nick that some language clarification about re-election after break period should be considered. Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] yet another heave on the WG Chair selection procedure
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] yet another heave on the WG Chair selection procedure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]