[dns-wg] proposal for appointment/removal of WG co-chairs
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] proposal for appointment/removal of WG co-chairs
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] proposal for appointment/removal of WG co-chairs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
João Damas
joao at bondis.org
Wed Oct 8 12:05:41 CEST 2014
I like simplicity that works so, in general, the proposal looks good to me. A few questions though: On 08 Oct 2014, at 11:43, Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote: > > Comments welcome. > > # > # $Id: appointment,v 1.6 2014/10/06 11:46:56 jim Exp $ > # > [1] The DNS WG will have N co-chairs. N will normally be 2 or 3, as > determined by the WG. > Can we at least pick a default value, e.g. 3 as it is now, since it seems to work. > [2] A co-chair will serve a term of N years, where N is the number > of co-chairs. Terms will be staggered so that one term expires every > year. A co-chair cannot serve more than 2 consecutive terms. > > [3] The WG will be given adequate notice that a co-chair's term is > ending and to invite applications for that position. Anyone can > volunteer for appointment. > > [4] At the end of a co-chair's term, the WG will decide by consensus > who is appointed to the available co-chair position. In the event of a > tie, the consensus tied candidates will draw lots. Please define tie in the context of a consensus process. Sounds like one of these simple-to-say/hard-to-do-right things. What would be wrong with a simple vote? sounds simpler. > > [5] The WG may decide by consensus to remove a WG co-chair at any time. > > [6] Consensus will be determined on the DNS WG mailing list. The consensus > judgement will be made by the serving WG co-chair(s) and will exclude the > co-chair who is the subject of that consensus judgement. > > [7] Any appeal over a consensus decision will be heard by the RIPE Chair > (or their deputy) whose decision shall be final. In closing, would the current co-chairs stay in place, initiate a rotation right away, or all clear the deck (ala IPv6 wg)? Thanks for this, Joao -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 203 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/dns-wg/attachments/20141008/c3b236b1/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] proposal for appointment/removal of WG co-chairs
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] proposal for appointment/removal of WG co-chairs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]