[dns-wg] Turning off lameness checks for reverse

On 28.03.09 19:55, Shane Kerr wrote:
> Is there any support for disabling lameness checks for reverse DNS?
> 
> 1. It seems that they cause some annoyance to administrators.
> 
> 2. As far as I know there has never been a study showing improvement for
>    DNS users based on removing lameness in reverse DNS (or in any DNS).
> 
> These two things suggest to me that the pro-active lameness checks
> should be disabled, at least until it is shown that lameness actually
> causes problems.

It would be satisfying for me if those would go to the e-mail: addresses,
since they seem to go to changed: addresses.

In our company, different people care about DNS and RIPE, the RIPE contacts
are making changes according to our requests, but notices are going to them,
no to us....
-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759