[dns-wg] .ORG DNSSEC Survey
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] .ORG DNSSEC Survey
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] .ORG DNSSEC Survey
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Thu Jun 26 17:01:57 CEST 2008
>On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 03:28:09PM -0400, Edward Lewis wrote: >> At 19:53 -0700 6/24/08, David Conrad wrote: >> ...polled -some- root server operators.. Emphasis mine > > If indeed the (ICANN) root server operators have misgiving about the > experiment, could someone operating a root server express the reasons? > two things here. DRC didn't not poll -all- the operators, only some subset that he selected. re misgivings about sanctioned alternate roots that remain persistant... discusssions go back atleast a decade - details in old rssac minutes. in this case, (one) of the concerns is the defacto hijacking of the root zone editorial function - which is still done under contract/MOU wiht DoC and VSGN. Just one POV. --bill
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] .ORG DNSSEC Survey
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] .ORG DNSSEC Survey
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]