[dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Tue Jun 7 20:17:47 CEST 2005
On Jun 7, 2005, at 18:04, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote: > for "fun" - some folks rotate the various canonical names > that exist for any given A or AAAA or (for difficult types) > A6 records that exist. > > and Jim, you confuse me. Mission accomplished! :-) > posit: > > twinkle.little.bat. AAAA 3ffe::dead:beef > muffet.satona.tuffit. aaaa 3ffe::dead:beef > PDC.e164.arpa. AAAA 3ffe::dead:beef > > which is THE canonical lable for the address 3ffe::dead:beef ?? I dunno. It'll be whatever one you've decided will be the canonical label today. After all you did say you rotated them for fun....
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]