[dns-wg] Jumping the gun on SIDN!
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Jumping the gun on SIDN!
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] ripe policy about reverse dns?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jakob Schlyter
jakob at rfc.se
Thu Oct 28 22:39:47 CEST 2004
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Pim van Pelt wrote: > nsauth1.bit.nl. 86400 IN A 213.136.12.51 > nsauth2.bit.nl. 86400 IN A 213.136.12.59 > nsauth3.bit.nl. 86400 IN A 212.204.192.11 > nsauth1.bit.nl. 86400 IN AAAA 2001:7b8:3:2c::53 > nsauth2.bit.nl. 86400 IN AAAA 2001:7b8:3:2d::53 > nsauth3.bit.nl. 86400 IN AAAA 2001:898:1001:1003::53 IIRC there are still bind8 server out there that will choke on zone where all nameservers have both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses - it might be a good idea to keep at least one IPv4-only server. jakob
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Jumping the gun on SIDN!
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] ripe policy about reverse dns?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]