[dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piet Beertema
Piet.Beertema at cwi.nl
Thu Oct 21 14:07:01 CEST 2004
>> Which is short-sighted. What's the use of blocking only *existing* >> ccTLD codes, when nobody can foresee what new ccTLD codes may come >> to exist in the future? We've seen enough recent examples... > >Okay, so block all two and three-letter SLDs, under the assumption that >if they aren't already valid TLDs, they might become valid TLDs in the >future. That would cause problems for ibm.eu, but would guarantee that >you can prevent .com.eu from being registered (as one example). I wouldn't go that far. I would block all 2-letter codes and the "historical" 3-letter codes. After all there's no rule for (new) generic TLD's. Piet
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]