[dns-wg] Progress with DNS Quality, Also: Lameness
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Progress with DNS Quality, Also: Lameness
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Progress with DNS Quality, Also: Lameness
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brad Knowles
brad.knowles at skynet.be
Thu May 22 20:34:13 CEST 2003
At 4:59 PM +0200 2003/05/22, Joao Luis Silva Damas wrote: >> At the very least, a more coordinated and public "name and shame" >> campaign might possibly do some good. > > Be careful with "name and shame" policies. People might start asking > why an organisation they are giving money to (particularly if they > have only one choice for that organisation) would go about "naming > and shaming" them. Sorry, when I said "name and shame", I meant from the perspective of an independent third party. Something along these lines is already done today, but I believe that these efforts could be increased and improved on. -- Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles at skynet.be> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania. GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+ !w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++) tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Progress with DNS Quality, Also: Lameness
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Progress with DNS Quality, Also: Lameness
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]