Experiments on production DNS (was: Re: NS.EU.NET running NSD)
- Previous message (by thread): Experiments on production DNS (was: Re: NS.EU.NET running NSD)
- Next message (by thread): Experiments on production DNS (was: Re: NS.EU.NET running NSD)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stephane Bortzmeyer
bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Mon Jan 20 12:14:23 CET 2003
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 12:01:56PM +0100, Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net> wrote a message of 22 lines which said: > > Yes, they had, but ICANN/DoC bureaucrats hold them hostages. > > If people feel inclined to send e-mail about this subject, please > address it to one or more of the persons mentioned on Funny joke, writing to ICANN when you disagree with them :-) > http://www.icann.org/general/abouticann.htm I am aware that RIPE is not ICANN and that ICANN Web server is www.icann.org. I just wanted to be sure that nobody left the thread with the impression that some ccTLD managers are lousy enough to take several months to make their paperwork when a nameserver changes. Now that the responsabilities have been clearly determined, we can go back to nsd.
- Previous message (by thread): Experiments on production DNS (was: Re: NS.EU.NET running NSD)
- Next message (by thread): Experiments on production DNS (was: Re: NS.EU.NET running NSD)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]