Experiments on production DNS (was: Re: NS.EU.NET running NSD)
- Previous message (by thread): Experiments on production DNS (was: Re: NS.EU.NET running NSD)
- Next message (by thread): Experiments on production DNS (was: Re: NS.EU.NET running NSD)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
woeber at cc.univie.ac.at
Mon Jan 20 12:12:49 CET 2003
>> Your argument might be that "they had enough time to migrate". True. > >Yes, they had, but ICANN/DoC bureaucrats hold them hostages. That's an issue not directly (technically :-) related to this discussion. >IMHO, it is better to shut it down completely. The DNS behaves fine >when a server is down, not when it is running and giving possibly >wrong information (as ns.eu.net hosted by RIPE already did for former >domains of EUnet-France). Could someone explain *what the real problem* is, if it exists/ed? I am definitely NOT a DNS expert, but I couldn't verify a "wrong" answer returned by ns.eu.net yet. >Otherwise, nsd is a very fine software :-) and I'm glad to see it used >in production. Why not trying it on NS.RIPE.NET? But _if_ there is a problem (and not simply a _different_ behaviour than bind would respond, due to an inconsistent configuration somewhere), then everybody would be better off to get it documented and fixed, I suppose? Wilfried. PS: I am very interested to get this sorted out, because we already have that creature doing business here, and I'm considering to use it for another service soon. Thanks....
- Previous message (by thread): Experiments on production DNS (was: Re: NS.EU.NET running NSD)
- Next message (by thread): Experiments on production DNS (was: Re: NS.EU.NET running NSD)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]