clueing in TLD registries for delegations to non-BIND servers
- Previous message (by thread): clueing in TLD registries for delegations to non-BIND servers
- Next message (by thread): clueing in TLD registries for delegations to non-BIND servers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bruce Campbell
bruce.campbell at ripe.net
Fri Feb 7 15:33:50 CET 2003
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 06:42:45PM +0100, > Stefan Paletta <stefanp at cabal1.com> wrote > a message of 25 lines which said: > > > Some TLD registries, however, make unreasonable demands regarding the > > behaviour of servers to which they delegate zones. Most notably the > > .fr and .it registries, which apparently demand that servers return a > > (non-authoritative!, in the case of .it) referral to the root servers > > when they are lame. You may wish to refer to the dnsop archives, and the 'Should a nameserver know about itself?' thread, starting at: http://www.cafax.se/dnsop/maillist/2001-05/msg00009.html ( I am not expressing an opinion of the RIPE NCC, just work I did at my previous employer ) > I am not involved in the daily operations of the '.fr' registry but, > AFAIK, the ZoneCheck tool (check it out yourself > <URL:http://www.nic.fr/zonecheck/>) requires a referral only if your > server claims to be recursive. Is this 'recursive for the zone being delegated' (somewhat bad) or 'recursive' in general ? Regards, -- Bruce Campbell RIPE Systems/Network Engineer NCC www.ripe.net - PGP562C8B1B Operations/Security
- Previous message (by thread): clueing in TLD registries for delegations to non-BIND servers
- Next message (by thread): clueing in TLD registries for delegations to non-BIND servers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]