A work item?
- Previous message (by thread): A work item?
- Next message (by thread): A work item?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bruce Campbell
bruce.campbell at apnic.net
Tue Mar 13 10:02:23 CET 2001
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Mally Mclane wrote: > On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Daniel Karrenberg wrote: > > > > Do any ISPs or web hosting companies have publically available > > > statements on their web sites stating that they will not support the > > > new new.net domains and why they won't? I am getting more requests > > > from users to change our DNS root servers to support this and wanted > > > to see what others tell their users. Any IETF/ICANN statement > > > available? A brief Google search produces the following (fairly concise and hefty) document: http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin/articles/icann.pdf > Speaking from my experience, the new.net idea has been rubbished both on > uknot (a list which consists of a lot of the UK Internet Industry > movers'n'shakers) and ecdiscuss, it's also been rubbished a lot in the > press. It comes down to - alternative roots break the accepted consistency of the existing hierarchial DNS structure. Unfortunately, there are many crackpots (yes, we get a few who perceive that APNIC has a slightly different role than it does) who take a lot of explaining in order to get the above simple idea through their heads ;) --==-- Bruce. Speaking for myself.
- Previous message (by thread): A work item?
- Next message (by thread): A work item?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]